Dela, meaning “to share” in Swedish, was launched in 2019 and created in partnership with
Ashoka, the world’s largest network of systems changing social entrepreneurs and changemakers.
The programme supports leading social entrepreneurs to develop robust strategies and offers a safe space to innovate and test solutions. With an emphasis on systems change, the participating Ashoka fellows further explore solutions to target the underlying causes of a range of social challenges.
An opportunity for reflection and learning
To date, Dela has supported 35 social entrepreneurs over the three yearlong accelerator programmes, Dela I, II and III. During the third accelerator, we felt the programme was ready for external evaluation. We wanted to build on the internal monitoring and learning that allowed us to shape and refine the programme and to test its assumptions, performance and contribution [to outcomes]. We also wanted to use the evaluation as input to the discussion with Ashoka on extending our partnership.
We undertook the evaluation the same way we developed Dela – with the spirit of collaboration. We worked closely with Ashoka throughout the process to ensure that the evaluation was perceived as it was intended – an opportunity for learning rather than an audit.
“It’s been fantastic to work on the evaluation with Ashoka and we are excited to the continuing development of the Dela programme,” says Jens Andersson, the Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Lead at IKEA Social Entrepreneurship.
As our first external evaluation of a programme at IKEA Social Entrepreneurship, we took this as an opportunity to learn about how best to perform one as well. We’d like to share some insight into the evaluation process and some of the key takeaways from the report.
Setting the aim and the evaluation framework
The report tracks the evolution of the programme in its first three years, summarises and analyses the findings of the evaluation, formulates learnings from the programme and partnership between IKEA Social Entrepreneurship and Ashoka, and provides recommendations for future Dela programmes and partnerships.
We decided to apply the
OECD DAC evaluation criteria of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and impact to the evaluation. It is a widely used evaluation framework that facilitates conceptual clarity and comparability. Together with Ashoka and ECORYS, we formulated specific evaluation questions under each criterion and designed methods to collect evidence to answer these questions. On this basis, ECORYS conducted the evaluation independently and produced the final report.
A robust approach to understand the effects of the programme
The overall approach of the evaluation was inspired by two main methods: outcome harvesting and most-significant change stories. To get a wide range of deep insights, ECORYS conducted scoping interviews with the seven Dela team members, one-on-one interviews with 14 Dela participants and FDGs (Focus-Group Discussions) and interviews with selected IKEA co-workers who participated in the programme as mentors for the social enterprises.